try djvusmall with Arcand 300 profile
step by step:
1. start DjvuSmall 0.4.4
2. drag and drop your tiff on program window
3. in LEFT LOWER corner present dropdown with label "Select encoding profile". Use it to set Arcand Scanned (300 dpi)
4. Press button "Convert"
5. If backgrond layer too blurry, press button "Options"
6. Press "Encode to Djvu"
7. In RIGHT LOWER corner check option "Bg subsample" & set it to 1 - obtain 1:1 background resolution. Try bigger value - size=quality/bg subsample
8. Close window by click on RED button in UPPER RIGHT corner
9. Press "Convert"
10. If do not satisfied with size - in step 7 try bigger value: size=quality/bg subsample
Thanks, NBell. I had tried this but I was not understanding what "Bg subsample" values mean. Because when I change from 1 to higher the quality actually diminishes. Changing from 1 to higher makes the file smaller and more blurry. So it seems to me the best option I the default Arcand300dpi, without changing the settings. But this is still a bit blurry for me.
Can you download this sample scan?
https://www.wetransfer.com/downloads/4dc85a692d2c73d6e6be01508fa18d7c20130215105716/de627e#It's a raw color tiff scan at 300 dpi.
13MB
If I use directly djvusmall (with no scantailor before) on the raw file, then with:
Arcand 300 dpi , I get a 180KB file, which is not very bad quality, but still too blurry.
Photo600, I get a 200KB not very good.
Photo300 is exactly the same as Photo600.
Aggressive600 gives me a 167KB file, not very good.
If I use scantailor and output it at Photo600 I get a 50 MB tiff file, with great quality.
Then I used several options over this 50 MB file on djvu small:
Aggressive600 to get a 222KB file with no blurring, great.
Arcand300 to get a 298KB a bit blurred.
Photo600 to get a 315KB with no blurring, great, looks like the Aggressive600.
I'll probably try this now, when the raw tiff scan is 600dpi.
Anyway the results above show that there is not a very great difference in size, and Arcand always the more blurry.
Is there other settings you recommend me trying?
Maybe I'll go for the Aggresive600, after output with scantailor at Photo600.
As I said, I did not understand the Bg subsample, because it got worse and smaller when I increased from 1 to other values.
use FR11 DjVu Text Layer Crutch for FineReader 11.0.102.583 text layer transfer
I tried this, and found some small russian instructions on a forum (which I translated with google), but it gave me an error: it did not open the djvu file with ocr that FR11 saved. The interface is all in russian unfortunately.